Monthly Archives: April 2014

CDC: Vaccines prevent millions of illnesses, but measles makes a return

April_Part 2_Internal Medicine_General Practitioners_Family Medicine_Nurses

Vaccines will prevent an estimated 322 million illnesses, 21 million hospitalizations, and 732,000 premature deaths during the lifetimes of children born during the two decades after the Vaccines for Children Program began in 1994, according to a report released April 24 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In addition, vaccines will save an estimated $295 billion in direct costs and $1.38 trillion in societal costs, according to the analysis, published in the April 25 issue of Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR 2014;61:352-5). The Vaccines for Children (VFC) Program, which provides recommended vaccines to about half the children in the United States, was created in 1993 in response to a resurgence of measles during 1989-1991, caused mostly by a failure to vaccinate uninsured children at the recommended age of 12-15 months.

The VFC provides vaccines to children if they are eligible for Medicaid, are uninsured, or are American Indian or Alaskan native. Children who are underinsured and do not have vaccine coverage are also eligible. About half of the children in the United States receive vaccines through this program.

To estimate the program’s effect on health care costs and the health of all children born from 1994 to 2013, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) evaluated national data on immunization coverage, and used a cost-benefit model that estimated illnesses, hospitalizations, and premature deaths (not including influenza and hepatitis A).

Measles makes 2014 return

But a second MMWR report released April 24 described 58 confirmed measles cases in California during the first 4 months of this year, in children and adults from age 5 months to 60 years. That report illustrates some of the current vaccination challenges, particularly with cases related to people traveling to and from outside the United States.

California’s 58 measles cases were reported from January 2014 through April 16, 2014. It’s the highest number of cases reported for that calendar period in the state since 1995. The 129 cases reported in the United States during this period also were the largest number reported since 1996 (MMWR 2014;61:362-3). No deaths have been reported.

During a CDC media briefing on April 24, Dr. Anne Schuchat said that 34 of the 129 cases were imported cases, and occurred in residents traveling abroad or people traveling to the United States. Among those infected who were traveling to the United States, 17 people were from the Philippines, which is in the midst of a large measles outbreak – with about 20,000 confirmed or suspected cases, including 69 deaths, through February.

“Though not direct imports, most of the remaining cases are known to be linked to importation,” said Dr. Schuchat, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, and one of the authors of the VFC study.

The 129 cases of measles nationwide have been reported in 13 states. Cities and states with the highest number of cases are California, with 58 cases; New York City, with 24 cases; and Washington state, with 13 cases.

“While the story of the 1989 measles resurgence was one of poor children missing out on vaccines because they didn’t have insurance, today’s measles outbreaks are too often the result of people opting out” of vaccination, she said, noting that 84% of the cases have been in people who were not vaccinated or did not know if they had been vaccinated. This included 68% with personal-belief exemptions.

The California report shows the risk of measles spreading in health care settings, Dr. Schuchat noted. Of the California cases, 11 were transmitted in health care settings, including 6 in health care personnel.

Most of the 58 measles cases in California this year were in people who were not vaccinated (43%) or could not document that they had been vaccinated (31%), according to the report. The 25 patients who were not vaccinated included 19 who had philosophical objections to vaccination, and 3 who were too young for the vaccine. But 19% – two children and nine adults – had received two or more doses of MMR vaccine.

Most cases – 54 (93%) – were associated with imported cases, and included 13 cases of U.S. residents who had traveled internationally, 8 to the Philippines.

Travelers should vaccinate

The increase in imported cases from the Philippines “and subsequent transmission in certain settings in the United States highlight the importance of ensuring age-appropriate vaccination for persons traveling to areas where measles is endemic and maintaining high vaccination coverage at the national and local level,” according to the report’s authors.

The researchers also recommend that all residents of the United States born after 1956 make sure they have received the MMR vaccine “or have serologic evidence of measles immunity.”

If individuals do not have serologic evidence of immunity and are traveling outside of North America or South America, the CDC recommends one dose of MMR vaccine for infants aged 6-11 months, and two doses of MMR vaccine at least 28 days apart in children aged 1 year and older, and in adults.

There were no author disclosures for either report.

 

http://www.internalmedicinenews.com/single-view/cdc-vaccines-prevent-millions-of-illnesses-but-measles-makes-a-return/b35787fd9fbbf67901ec8920ecb5efdb.html

 

 

 

Advertisements

Quick, simple blood test for solid cancers looks feasible

Oncology_Nephrology_Urology_OBGYN

The idea of a general, quick and simple blood test for a diverse range of cancers just came closer to reality with news of a new study published in Nature Medicine.

Researchers from Stanford University School of Medicine have devised an ultra-sensitive method for finding DNA from cancer tumors in the bloodstream.

Previous research has already shown circulating tumor DNA holds promise as a biomarker for cancer, but existing methods for detecting it are not sufficiently sensitive and do not cover a diverse range of cancers.

Ways to increase the sensitivity and coverage of such tests exist, but these are cumbersome and time-consuming, and need lots of steps to customize for individual patients, so they are not feasible for use in clinics.

The new approach promises to change that. It is highly sensitive and specific and should be broadly applicable to a range of cancers, say the researchers.

Their new test identified around half of patients with stage 1 lung cancer and all patients with stage 2 or higher disease. They also showed the circulation tumor DNA was highly correlated with tumor volume estimated using CT and PET scans.

This suggests an approach based on CAPP-Seq could monitor tumors at a fraction of the cost of present methods that rely on imaging studies.

Team faced two major hurdles

In developing the test, they faced two major hurdles, as Maximilian Diehn, co-senior author and assistant professor of radiation oncology, explains:

“First, the technique needs to be very sensitive to detect the very small amounts of tumor DNA present in the blood. Second, to be clinically useful it’s necessary to have a test that works off the shelf for the majority of patients with a given cancer.”

Co-senior author, Ash Alizadeh, assistant professor of medicine, explains why they are interested in developing a general way to detect and measure disease burden in solid cancers, and how they are approaching it:

“Blood cancers like leukemias can be easier to monitor than solid tumors through ease of access to the blood. By developing a general method for monitoring circulating tumor DNA, we’re in effect trying to transform solid tumors into liquid tumors that can be detected and tracked more easily.”

Cancer cells divide and die, even without treatment. When a cancer cell dies, the DNA in its nucleus escapes into the bloodstream. This is present in small concentrations; something like 1 in 1,000 or 10,000 bits of DNA in the blood can be from a dead cancer cell in a person with cancer.

Even in patients with advanced cancer, the vast majority of DNA circulating in their blood is from healthy, normal cells.

So a test that can quickly and non-invasively monitor the tiny concentrations of cancer cell DNA would be really useful to clinicians who need to estimate the size of the tumor, how it changes over time, and monitor a patient’s response to treatment.

New test boosts existing methods for analyzing DNA

The team found a way to do this by boosting existing methods for extracting, processing and analyzing the DNA. They called their approach CAPP-Seq (which is short for Cancer Personalized Profiling by deep Sequencing).

CAPP-Seq is sensitive enough to detect one molecule of tumor DNA among 10,000 DNA molecules from healthy cells in the blood.

In their study, they tested blood from patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (this includes most lung cancers, like adenocarcinomas, squamous cell carcinoma and large cell carcinoma). But they say the approach should also work with solid cancers that occur in other parts of the body.

And while they see the test one day being used to follow the progress of tumors in patients already diagnosed with cancer, the researchers say it also has potential as a cancer screening tool for healthy and at-risk populations.

Although the test is described as a general test for cancer, it by no means just looks for one pattern of DNA. Each cancer is genetically different in different patients, but there are certain sets of DNA mutations that are the same across patients with the same cancer.

So the challenge was to find which DNA sequences were the ones most likely to indicate the presence of a given cancer across a diverse range of patients.

Test looks for as many of the known mutations for a given cancer as possible

This is why the team decided to take a population-based approach. They looked in national databases that contain DNA sequences of tumors from thousands of patients, and identified the points on the cancer DNA that are different from normal DNA.

From this information, they were able to compile a fingerprint for each cancer type made up of all the DNA mutations recorded – these include insertions or deletions of short pieces of genetic material, plus where sequences of DNA have been shuffled around or even flipped over.

But while no patient will have all these mutations, nearly all of them will have at least one of them. This makes it possible to compile a test that looks for as many of the known mutations for a given cancer as possible. But it only has to find one of them to strike a positive.

The next stage of the study was to examine the genome of the 407 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer recruited for the study.

Prof. Alizadeh explains how, using an approach called bioinformatics, they looked for regions in the genome enriched for cancer-associated mutations:

“We looked for which genes are most commonly altered, and used computational approaches to identify what we call the genetic architecture of the cancer. That allowed us to identify the part of the genome that would be best to identify and track the disease.”

They identified 139 genes that only represent 0.004% of the human genome but are recurrently mutated in non-small-cell lung cancer.

“By sequencing only those regions of the genome that are highly enriched for cancer mutations, we’re able to keep costs down and identify multiple mutations per patient,” Prof. Diehn says.

Other approaches tend to look for single, well-known mutations that occur frequently, but not necessarily in every patient, with a particular cancer. Because it looks for more than one mutation, the CAPP-Seq approach is more sensitive and gives researchers more flexibility in how to track the cancer over time.

Prof. Diehn explains that there are currently no reliable biomarkers for lung cancer, a cancer that claims the most lives. He says they are “very excited” about the study results because “a personalized, clinically useful biomarker could revolutionize how we detect and manage this devastating disease.”

The team is now working on ways to quickly home in on patient-specific mutations and methods to suppress background noise in a sample so they can identify even very tiny amounts of cancer DNA that might be in it.

CAPP-Seq may also have possibilities as a prognostic tool

The researchers say CAPP-Seq may also have potential as a prognostic tool. When they tested one patient thought to have been successfully treated for lung cancer, they found low levels of circulating tumor DNA. The cancer came back in that patient, and they died.

Conversely, scans of another patient who was treated for early stage disease showed a mass that was thought to indicate disease was still present. But CAPP-Seq found no circulating tumor DNA in that patient’s blood, and they remained disease-free for the rest of the study period.

And in a third patient, CAPP-Seq found a mutation that makes non-small-cell lung cancer resistant to the drug that is commonly used to treat it.

Prof. Diehn says this suggests another use for the approach – to monitor how the tumor progresses and look out for the emergence of treatment resistance early on, giving enough time to switch therapy to target the resistant cells.

“It’s also possible we could use CAPP-Seq to identify subsets of early stage patients who could benefit most from additional treatment after surgery or radiation, such as chemotherapy or immunotherapy,” he adds.

Funds from a number of sources helped finance the study, including the Department of Defense and the National Institutes of Health.

Meanwhile, Medical News Today recently learned how another US study led by The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI) found a new biomarker for head and neck cancer and non-small-cell lung cancer. That study focused on CCTα – an antigen that prompts the immune system to make specific antibodies – and concluded it was a better predictor of patient outcomes than expression of ERCC1, which is involved in DNA repair.

Written by Catharine Paddock PhD

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/275146.php

 

%d bloggers like this: